Safety trainers match pedagogy to training goals by ensuring relevance, selecting delivery methods, and evaluating outcomes¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In interviews, trainers reported ensuring relevance by selecting topics from learners' direct work contexts (15 trainers) and using practical examples (12), selecting delivery methods such as hands-on training (17) and lectures (12), and evaluating learning outcomes (11). → Lehikko 2025

Evidence¶

Lehikko 2025¶

Lehikko, A., Nykänen, M., & Ruokamo, H. (2025). Conceptualizing a pedagogical model for immersive virtual reality safety training: pedagogical practices in trainer interviews. Education Tech Research Dev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-025-10490-1

q2 · i? · qualitative · r3

Content analysis of 18 semi-structured thematic interviews with safety trainers in two Finnish work organizations, coded inductively and reported as frequencies. The category 'match the pedagogy to training goals' comprised the subcategories 'ensure relevance', 'select delivery method', and 'evaluate outcomes'; trainers "sought to incorporate examples of the learners' everyday work situations in the training process."

"Fifteen trainers mentioned selecting topics from the learners' direct work contexts. Twelve referred to the use of practical examples, and five talked about providing training that focused on teamwork. The second subcategory was select delivery method"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Trainer interview findings support the sociocultural framing of the IVR safety training model, including the social setting around individual IVR scenarios — related
• Safety trainers guide social interaction in training situations by facilitating interaction and maintaining temporal structure — related
• Safety trainers utilize organizational social and material resources for training development — related