Claims

Low-performing students access solutions more often than higher-performing students, while hint access does not differ across quartiles

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r1–r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 The lowest performing quartile accessed solutions significantly more often than the high, mid-high, and mid-low groups (η² = 0.04, a small effect size), but the four groups did not differ in hint access. → Hou 2025 q3 i? Hint access frequency showed no statistically significant difference across the four performance quartiles. → Hou 2025 (2)

Evidence

Hou 2025

Hou, C., Kuhlmann, S. L., Greene, J. A., Bernacki, M. L., & Hogan, K. A. (2025). Process mining measures students' help-seeking transitions when completing assignments in an online learning and assessment platform. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09442-0

q3 · i2 · associational · r1

Kruskal-Wallis tests across the four exam-performance quartiles of 482 biology students showed solution access differed across groups, η² = 0.04, a "small effect size (Richardson, 2011)". Dunn's tests showed the lowest group accessed solutions significantly more than each other group.

"a Kruskal-Wallis test between the groups indicated a statistically significant difference in the frequency at which they accessed solutions, (c2(3) = 24.31, p <.001, η2 = 0.04), with a small effect size (Richardson, 2011)"

Hou 2025 (2)

Hou, C., Kuhlmann, S. L., Greene, J. A., Bernacki, M. L., & Hogan, K. A. (2025). Process mining measures students' help-seeking transitions when completing assignments in an online learning and assessment platform. Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-025-09442-0

q3 · i? · associational · r2

The same Kruskal-Wallis frequency analysis of 482 students' trace data found "no statistically significant differences between the groups in hint access" (χ²(3) = 2.88, p = .41); no effect size was printed, so the null is not evidence of equivalence.

"a Krusal-Wallis test indicated no statistically significant differences between the groups in hint access (c2(3) = 2.88, p =.41."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id solution-access-differs-hints-do-not
title Low-performing students access solutions more often than higher-performing students, while hint access does not differ across quartiles
description Low-performing students access solutions more often than higher-performing students, while hint access does not differ across quartiles
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2025
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — hou-2025, hou-2025-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.