Claims

Spaced CPR training is associated with improved skill retention compared with single-session massed instruction

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Across included studies, spaced training was generally associated with improved CPR skill retention compared with single-session training, including better 3-month compression depth retention in a randomized trial. → Lee Hyeon-Ji 2026

Evidence

Lee Hyeon-Ji 2026

Lee Hyeon-Ji. (2026). Training interval, feedback, and retention in cardiopulmonary resuscitation education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09538-4

q3 · i? · review · r2

Narrative synthesis of 20 interventional studies (RCTs and quasi-experimental designs) published 2015–2024; the review reports that "spaced training was associated with improved CPR skill retention compared with single-session, massed instruction." Table 3 records a randomized trial showing better compression-depth retention with spaced training at 3 months. No meta-analysis was feasible due to heterogeneity.

"A consistent pattern across included studies was that spaced training was associated with improved CPR skill retention compared with single-session, massed instruction."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.