Claims

Regression analysis shows the spacing effect holds in aggregate and the select group's advantage over other groups increases with number of reviews

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Huber regression coefficients indicate that more spaced reviews yield lower final normalized empirical forgetting rate, and that w_difficulty > 0 and w_random > 0 across all #reviews, with coefficients for other groups increasing with number of reviews. → Utkarsh Upadhyay 2021

Evidence

Utkarsh Upadhyay 2021

Utkarsh Upadhyay, Graham Lancashire, Christoph Moser and Manuel Gomez-Rodriguez. (2021). Large-scale randomized experiments reveals that machine learning-based instruction helps people memorize more effectively. npj Science of Learning 6:26. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-021-00105-8

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Huber regression (Table 1) of normalized empirical forgetting rate on review time and group indicators for a fixed number of reviews. The article states the spacing effect "holds true in aggregate" and that coefficients "seem to increase with number of reviews"; no standardized effect size is printed.

"The results also suggest that, since wdifficulty > 0 and wrandom > 0 across all #reviews, learners in the ‘select’group have lower forgetting rate and, since the coef ficients for the other groups seem to increase with number of reviews, the competitive advantage offered by our machine learning algorithm increases with the number of reviews."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id spacing-effect-and-advantage-grows-with-reviews
title Regression analysis shows the spacing effect holds in aggregate and the select group's advantage over other groups increases with number of reviews
description Regression analysis shows the spacing effect holds in aggregate and the select group's advantage over other groups increases with number of reviews
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2021
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-26
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — utkarsh-upadhyay-2021

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.