Transfer from mini-game practice to spoken production is smaller than transfer to written tasks¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Practice transferred to written productive tasks and, to a smaller extent, to spoken productive tasks. → Cornillie 2015
Evidence¶
Cornillie 2015¶
Cornillie, F., & Desmet, P. (2015). Design and empirical evaluation of controlled L2 practice through mini-games—moving beyond drill-and-kill?. Critical CALL – Proceedings of the 2015 EUROCALL Conference, Padova, Italy. http://dx.doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2015.000325
q2 · i? · causal · r2
The article's summary of its experimental findings: transfer occurred to near-transfer judgment tasks and complex written tasks, and to a smaller extent to spoken productive tasks measured by the OEIT. No effect size is printed for the spoken outcome.
"Results show that intensive receptive practice helped learners to develop knowledge that was accurate and quickly retrievable on tests of near transfer, and that practice also transferred to more complex written productive tasks, as well as—to a smaller extent—to spoken productive tasks."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Mini-game-supported controlled L2 practice transfers to written productive use, with higher accuracy on a written discourse completion test — related
- Time spent on mini-game practice predicts oral elicited imitation accuracy for learners aware of the grammar focus — related
- Spoken–written advantages are larger for retention outcomes and multiple-choice test formats than for transfer or mixed formats — related
- Pragmatic routine instruction showed no effect on learners' spoken production three weeks into treatment — related
- Testing effects are stronger when practice and final test formats are identical (g = 0.63) than dissimilar (g = 0.53), supporting transfer-appropriate processing — related
- Mini-game-supported controlled L2 practice improves accuracy and response times on a timed grammaticality judgment test relative to a control group — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.