Sport science students' baseline analytical thinking skills are very low, at 8.27% in this study and 3.24% mastery in prior research¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q1–q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2021: baselines and conditions change

Subclaims¶

q2 i? Pretest analytical thinking performance was 8.27%, below the 65.00% minimum mastery limit, with all aspects unmastered. → Sudibyo et al. 2016 q2 i? An earlier pilot study (Sudibyo et al., 2013) found only 3.24% mastery of sport mechanical analysis. → Sudibyo et al. 2016 (2)

Evidence¶

Sudibyo et al. 2016¶

Elok Sudibyo, Budi Jatmiko & Wahono Widodo. (2016). The Effectiveness of CBL Model to Improve Analytical Thinking Skills the Students of Sport Science. International Education Studies, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n4p195

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive pretest results from the same four-class sample: the article reports analytical thinking skills "still very low with the percentage of 8.27", below the stated 65.00% mastery limit, with all aspects unmastered.

"If it is considered the pretest data presented in the Table 2, it can be said that the analytical thinking skills of sport sciences’ students was still very low with the percentage of 8.27. Achievement of the value is still below the minimum limit of mastery (65.00%)."

Sudibyo et al. 2016 (2)¶

Elok Sudibyo, Budi Jatmiko & Wahono Widodo. (2016). The Effectiveness of CBL Model to Improve Analytical Thinking Skills the Students of Sport Science. International Education Studies, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n4p195

q1 · i? · causal · r1

The article cites its authors' prior study reporting mastery of only 3.24%, with graph reading, athlete comparison, and estimating items answered by no students; this is a cited background finding, not newly tested here.

"Based on research of Sudibyo et al. (2013), it showed that the students’ capability in analyzing the mechanics of a sport activity was still relatively very low. It only reac hed mastery level of 3.24%."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• A Context Based Learning physics model improves sport science students' analytical thinking skills with a high-category N-gain of 0.78 — related
• Paired t-tests show a statistically significant pretest-to-posttest increase in analytical thinking skills in all four classes at α = 0.05 — related