Paired t-tests show a statistically significant pretest-to-posttest increase in analytical thinking skills in all four classes at α = 0.05¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The null hypothesis of no increase was rejected in Class A, B, C, and D, with p-values of 0.000 (< 0.05). → Sudibyo et al. 2016
Evidence¶
Sudibyo et al. 2016¶
Elok Sudibyo, Budi Jatmiko & Wahono Widodo. (2016). The Effectiveness of CBL Model to Improve Analytical Thinking Skills the Students of Sport Science. International Education Studies, 9(4). https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v9n4p195
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Paired t-tests run in SPSS on pretest-posttest scores for each of the four classes, after Kolmogorov-Smirnov normality checks returned p = 0.200 for both universities. The article reports "p-value of t-test statistics for all paires ... was 0.000 (<0.05)"; no effect size is printed.
"The Table 4 informs that the significance (2-tailed) or p-value of t-test statistics for all paires (pretest and posttest) on Class A, B, C, and D was 0.000 (<0.05)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Both experimental and control groups improved significantly from pretest to posttest over the four-month period — a broader claim this one bears on
- The CL class improved significantly from pretest to posttest while the traditional-taught class did not — a broader claim this one bears on
- A four-phase teaching process for congruent triangles significantly improves grade 8 students' test scores — a broader claim this one bears on
- A Context Based Learning physics model improves sport science students' analytical thinking skills with a high-category N-gain of 0.78 — related
- Sport science students' baseline analytical thinking skills are very low, at 8.27% in this study and 3.24% mastery in prior research — related
- All four groups showed statistically significant pretest-to-posttest achievement gains, but gains differed greatly in size — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.