Interventions were effective across all child and adolescent age groups, with no particular age group in which interventions were most effective.¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r3 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? There was no particular age group in which interventions were most effective; they improved SR scores across all age groups. → Pandey A 2018

Evidence¶

Pandey A 2018¶

Pandey A, Hale D, Das S, Goddings A-L, Blakemore S-J, Viner RM. (2018). Effectiveness of Universal Self-regulation–Based Interventions in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatrics. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6059379/

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r3

Narrative review across 49 studies with participants aged 2 to 17 years (median 6.0 years). The review reports "There was no particular age group in which interventions were most effective; they improved SR scores across all age groups."

"There was no particular age group in which interventions were most effective; they improved SR scores across all age groups."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Universal self-regulation interventions improve self-regulation in children and adolescents, with a pooled effect size of d = 0.42 (95% CI, 0.32-0.53) on task performance scores. — a broader claim this one bears on
• Adolescents showed faster, more accurate, and less variable performance than children, with reward effects on inhibition accuracy differing by age — related
• Child age, caregiver education and country income level do not moderate book-sharing intervention effects on child language — related
• Mindfulness and yoga interventions improved self-regulation in 4 of 8 interventions (50%), mostly applied within the adolescent age group. — related
• Some interventions brought more improvements in self-regulation measures of those with lower baseline scores, offering promise for resource-constrained settings. — related