SRL components show moderate correlations within one assessment level but no correlations across different assessment methods within one component¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2021 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2024: tool and model accuracy changes quickly
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Within one assessment level, moderate correlations appear between SRL components, but across assessment methods within one component almost no correlations appear. → Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich 2021
Evidence¶
Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich 2021¶
Laura Dörrenbächer-Ulrich, Marie Weißenfels, Lea Russer, Franziska Perels. (2021). Multimethod assessment of self-regulated learning in college students: different methods for different components? Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-020-09533-2
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Correlational analysis of 70 college students' data from four SRL measures in a standardized laboratory setting. The abstract-level summary states "moderate to high relations between the different components of SRL ... within one assessment level" and "no relations between the different assessment methods within one component."
"Results indicate moderate to high relations between the different components of SRL (cognition, metacognition, and motivation) within one assessment level and no relations between the different assessment methods within one component."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The only significant cross-method correlation within one SRL component is motivation assessed by questionnaire and closed-ended microanalytic questions — possibly the same claim (merge candidate)
- Whether an SRL component correlates with GPA depends on how it is assessed: cognition via a strategy knowledge test, motivation via questionnaire, metacognition via an open-ended microanalytic question — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- The SKT-SRL shows low, mostly non-significant correlations with SRL microanalysis (online measure) — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Measurement methods moderate SRL–EF correlations, with indirect measures correlating higher than direct measures — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
srl-monomethod-correlations-no-heteromethod |
title |
SRL components show moderate correlations within one assessment level but no correlations across different assessment methods within one component |
description |
SRL components show moderate correlations within one assessment level but no correlations across different assessment methods within one component |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2021 |
recheck_by |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — laura-dörrenbächer-ulrich-2021 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.