Zusho concludes SRL, SAL, and engagement perspectives all entail learner adaptation, and that models of student learning mismatch how they are measured¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · theoreticalr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Zusho's review concludes that self-regulated learning, student approaches to learning, and engagement perspectives all entail cognitive, affective, and behavioral adaptation, and that there is an inherent mismatch between conceptualizations of student learning and their measurement. → Patricia A. Alexander 2017
Evidence¶
Patricia A. Alexander 2017¶
Patricia A. Alexander. (2017). Issues of Constructs, Contexts, and Continuity: Commentary on Learning in Higher Education. Educational Psychology Review, 29, 345–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-017-9409-3
q2 · i? · theoretical · r2
The commentary reports Zusho's (2017) conclusions from reviewing the literature disentangling SRL, SAL, and engagement perspectives, including that "there is an inherent mismatch between the conceptualizations and models of student learning and how those models are measured and analyzed." Second-hand report.
"there is an inherent mismatch between the conceptualizations and models of student learning and how those models are measured and analyzed."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Review of 23 ILS studies since 2004 finds more dimensionality in learning patterns than previously considered
- Neither self-report nor eye tracking can reliably distinguish strategic from habituated behavior in empirical practice
- Fryer argues perceived control and need for competence may bridge differences among models of higher-education learning toward a mega-theory
- Dinsmore's review of 134 studies argues that models of strategic processing among college students must be multidimensional and dynamic
- Fewer than half of undergraduate mathematics SE studies define engagement explicitly, and definitions vary in their use of multidimensionality, psychological investment, and observable behavior — related
- The learning patterns model differs from SRL models by being multi-dimensional, non-normative, and including external regulation and lack of regulation — related
- The special issue's contributions divide between narrative-review and systematic-review methodologies — related
- Emotions are seldom explicitly analyzed in conversational CSCL contexts and must be balanced with cognition in conversation conceptualization — related
- S-SRL strategy use is dynamic over time, contexts and student characteristics, supporting an event-based conceptualization of self and socially regulated learning — related
- The reviewer argues that the dynamic character of appetites and desires must be considered in any thoroughgoing character-development plan — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
srl-sal-engagement-adaptation-measurement-mismatch |
title |
Zusho concludes SRL, SAL, and engagement perspectives all entail learner adaptation, and that models of student learning mismatch how they are measured |
description |
Zusho concludes SRL, SAL, and engagement perspectives all entail learner adaptation, and that models of student learning mismatch how they are measured |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2017 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — patricia-a-alexander-2017 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.