SRSD instruction improved students' accuracy in self-evaluating their texts' quality, although overestimation persisted¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? SRSD students evaluated their texts' quality more accurately than regular-instruction students, but persistent overestimation remained. → Jonathan Fernandez 2024
Evidence¶
Jonathan Fernandez 2024¶
Jonathan Fernandez, Jessica Guilbert. (2024). Self-regulated strategy development's effectiveness: underlying cognitive and metacognitive mechanisms. Metacognition and Learning (2024) 19:1091–1135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09398-7
q2 · i? · causal · r?
Monitoring accuracy was measured by asking students to self-rate their stories' overall quality on an 8-point scale after writing, compared with hypothesis-blind teachers' ratings. The article reports SRSD students "evaluated their texts' quality more accurately, despite persistent overestimation". No effect size is printed in the supplied text.
"The results indicated that compared with students who received regular writing instruction, students who underwent the SRSD intervention produced higher-quality texts and evaluated their texts' quality more accurately, despite persistent overestimation."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- French fourth- and fifth-graders who received SRSD instruction produced higher-quality stories than matched peers who received regular writing instruction — related
- Improvements in planning skills mediated SRSD's effect on text quality, via better-structured stories containing more ideas — related
- In one 2×2 experiment with 120 undergraduates, an Assessment-Performance Calibration Activity (APCA) gave the most accurate self-assessment and least overconfidence, and adding a feedback-literacy script did not improve calibration further — related
- Strategy Instruction Improves Writing Quality — a broader claim this one bears on
- Self Assessment Accuracy Is Low Without Training — related
- Learners are substantially overconfident when evaluating the quality of their self-generated examples — related
- The impact of the strategy training was higher for evaluation than for search skills, in terms of accuracy and quality of students' justifications. — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
srsd-improves-monitoring-accuracy-overestimation-persists |
title |
SRSD instruction improved students' accuracy in self-evaluating their texts' quality, although overestimation persisted |
description |
SRSD instruction improved students' accuracy in self-evaluating their texts' quality, although overestimation persisted |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — jonathan-fernandez-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.