Claims

SSIS-CIP positively impacts teacher-rated academic motivation and engagement, with a student-level pretest interaction on motivation

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (3 entries) · causal r2 · q3 · i1–i2
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 SSIS-CIP improved teacher-rated academic motivation, with an adjusted standardized difference of .34. → DiPerna 2014 q3 i1 SSIS-CIP improved teacher-rated academic engagement, with an adjusted standardized difference of .29. → DiPerna 2014 (2) q3 i? There was a statistically significant interaction between SSIS-CIP and student-level pretest on teacher ratings of academic motivation. → DiPerna 2014 (3)

Evidence

DiPerna 2014

DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P., Bellinger, J., & Cheng, W. (2014). Efficacy of the Social Skills Improvement System – Classwide Intervention Program (SSIS – CIP) in the Primary Grades. SREE Spring 2014 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED562704

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

Teacher ratings in the CRT (ACES Motivation subscale), analyzed with multilevel models adjusting for pretest and covariates. Table 4 prints the effect size .34 for academic motivation (adjusted standardized difference), which the article characterizes as small-medium per Cohen's criterion; the article concludes "SSIS-CIP positively impacted academic engagement and motivation".

"Academic Motivation 3.564 (.428) 3.351 (.497) 3.797 (.320) 3.364 (.454) .34"

DiPerna 2014 (2)

DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P., Bellinger, J., & Cheng, W. (2014). Efficacy of the Social Skills Improvement System – Classwide Intervention Program (SSIS – CIP) in the Primary Grades. SREE Spring 2014 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED562704

q3 · i1 · causal · r2

Teacher ratings in the CRT (ACES Engagement subscale), analyzed with multilevel models adjusting for pretest and covariates. Table 4 prints the effect size .29 for academic engagement (adjusted standardized difference), a small effect by the article's Cohen-criterion framing.

"Academic Engagement 3.901 (.444) 3.589 (.481) 4.148 (.350) 3.674 (.529) .29"

DiPerna 2014 (3)

DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P., Bellinger, J., & Cheng, W. (2014). Efficacy of the Social Skills Improvement System – Classwide Intervention Program (SSIS – CIP) in the Primary Grades. SREE Spring 2014 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED562704

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Multilevel models included product terms between SSIS-CIP and student-level pretest and demographics; the student pretest by condition interaction on academic motivation was significant and retained in the final model (coefficient -.179, p < .01 in Table 5).

"Moreover, there was a statistically significant interaction between SSIS-CIP and student-level pretest on teacher ratings of academic motivation."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.