Claims

SSIS-CIP shows no effects on directly observed positive social behavior or observed engaged time

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i0 negligible
Currency · newest study 2014 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i0 The adjusted standardized difference for observed positive social behavior was 0, indicating no treatment effect on this observational measure. → DiPerna 2014 q3 i? Observed active engaged time (-.03) and passive engaged time (.10) showed no meaningful treatment effects. → DiPerna 2014

Evidence

DiPerna 2014

DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P., Bellinger, J., & Cheng, W. (2014). Efficacy of the Social Skills Improvement System – Classwide Intervention Program (SSIS – CIP) in the Primary Grades. SREE Spring 2014 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED562704

q3 · i0 · causal · r2

CLOCK structured observations (12-minute observations, paired raters, agreement kappa .91-.99) analyzed with Poisson-distribution multilevel models (N=202). Table 4 prints an adjusted standardized difference of 0 for positive social behavior; active engaged time was -.03 and passive engaged time .10.

"Positive Social .492 (.451) .351 (.268) .370 (.405) .252 (.259) 0"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.