Claims

After the SSTP, teachers rewarded students' appropriate social behaviors, which they had not done before training

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Before training, teachers praised no students' social skills despite rewarding academic achievements; after training, rewarding by experimental teachers increased and teachers reported students displayed social skills more often. → Elif SAZAK PINAR 2013

Evidence

Elif SAZAK PINAR 2013

Elif SAZAK PINAR, Bülbin SUCUOGLU. (2013). The Outcomes of a Social Skills Teaching Program for Inclusive Classroom Teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(4), 2247-2261. https://www.edam.com.tr/kuyeb

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' discussion of the observation data: although teachers rewarded academic achievements before the SSTP, they did not praise proper display of social skills by any student; after training, rewarding increased. The student-behavior report is according to the teachers, not independently measured.

"After the training, rewarding the behaviors of the experiment group increased and, according to the teachers, the social skills were used more frequently by the students during classes. Therefore, it can be interpreted that the SSTP was effective in helping teachers recognize and reward social skills."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.