Claims

Knowledge gains from the SSTP were maintained at follow-up, with a small decrease attributed to absence of coaching and feedback

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2013 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Three months after training, experimental teachers' SSTKT scores remained significantly higher than control teachers' scores. → Elif SAZAK PINAR 2013 q2 i? The authors report a small decrease in knowledge at follow-up, which they attribute to not guiding teachers or providing performance feedback. → Elif SAZAK PINAR 2013 (2)

Evidence

Elif SAZAK PINAR 2013

Elif SAZAK PINAR, Bülbin SUCUOGLU. (2013). The Outcomes of a Social Skills Teaching Program for Inclusive Classroom Teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(4), 2247-2261. https://www.edam.com.tr/kuyeb

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Mann-Whitney U comparison of posttest and follow-up SSTKT scores of the 12 experimental and 17 control teachers: the follow-up difference remained significant (U=.5, p=.00), with the experimental group's mean rank higher at follow-up.

"(experiment and control group posttest U=.00, p=.00, experiment and control group follow-up U=.5, p=.00). The mean rank of the experiment group was higher than the mean rank of the control group in the follow-up stage."

Elif SAZAK PINAR 2013 (2)

Elif SAZAK PINAR, Bülbin SUCUOGLU. (2013). The Outcomes of a Social Skills Teaching Program for Inclusive Classroom Teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 13(4), 2247-2261. https://www.edam.com.tr/kuyeb

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' interpretation of the follow-up data: a small decrease in knowledge occurred, attributed to the absence of guidance and performance feedback during instruction; no effect size is printed for this decrease.

"In the follow-up data, it was found that there was a small decrease in the knowledge levels of the teachers. The researchers believed that this was a result of not guiding teachers in using the skills they had learned and not providing feedback to them about their performances during instruction."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.