Patience gains from the training program were maintained at the three-month follow-up test¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? At follow-up, the experimental group still differed significantly from the control group on all patience scale sub-dimensions. → Bülbül and Izgar 2018

Evidence¶

Bülbül and Izgar 2018¶

Ayşe Eliüşük Bülbül, Gö khan Izgar. (2018). Effects of the Patience Training Program on Patience and Well-Being Levels of University Students. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v6i1.2900

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Mann-Whitney U analysis of the trail (follow-up) test administered three months after the program ended, comparing experimental and control groups. The article reports the patience-scale difference "was significant in all sub -dimensions of the patience scale".

"When the Man-Whitney U test was repeated for the sub -dimensions of patience and well-being scales, the difference between the mean values obtained from the follow -up test and the control group was significant in all sub -dimensions of the patience scale."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The patience training program produced no significant change in university students' PERMA well-being levels — related
• A 5-week patience training program significantly raised all three patience sub-dimension scores of university students compared to a control group at post-test — related
• Within the experimental group, patience scores rose significantly from pre-test to post-test while control-group scores did not change — related