Claims

First-generation STAR Lite participants returned to good academic standing at higher rates than first-generation comparison students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Half of first-generation STAR Lite participants returned to good academic standing compared to only 30% in the comparison group, a 20-percentage-point difference. → Liu 2022

Evidence

Liu 2022

Liu, C., Bruner, J., & Ammigan, R. (2022). Success Training for Academic Resiliency: An Advising Intervention Program for Undergraduate Students on Probation. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 11(2). https://ojed.org/jise

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive comparison of return rates by background characteristic from Table 2 data across 153 STAR Lite participants and 41 comparison students. The article reports "Half of the first-generation participants returned to good academic standing compared to only 30% in the comparison group." No statistical test is reported for this subgroup contrast.

"Half of the first-generation participants returned to good academic standing compared to only 30% in the comparison group."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.