STAR Lite program participation showed no statistically significant relationship with returning to good academic standing after one semester¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? A simple t-test found no statistically significant relationship between being a STAR Lite participant and returning to good academic standing after a student's first semester. → Liu 2022

Evidence¶

Liu 2022¶

Liu, C., Bruner, J., & Ammigan, R. (2022). Success Training for Academic Resiliency: An Advising Intervention Program for Undergraduate Students on Probation. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 11(2). https://ojed.org/jise

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive quantitative analysis aggregating four semesters of data (spring 2018 through fall 2019) comparing 153 STAR Lite participants with 41 comparison students on probation. The article reports "A simple t-test found no statistically significant relationship between being a STAR Lite participant and returning to good academic standing." No effect size is printed.

"A simple t-test found no statistically significant relationship between being a STAR Lite participant and returning to good academic standing after a student's first semester."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Students completing all or extra STAR Lite components returned to good academic standing at higher rates than comparison students — reports the opposite
• First-generation STAR Lite participants returned to good academic standing at higher rates than first-generation comparison students — reports the opposite
• Male STAR Lite participants showed lower return-to-good-standing rates than male comparison students — related
• Student engagement with the STAR Lite program increased across successive cohorts — related