Students completing all or extra STAR Lite components returned to good academic standing at higher rates than comparison students¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Participants completing all or extra program components returned to good academic standing at a higher rate than the comparison group, while those completing none or some returned at a lower rate. → Liu 2022
Evidence¶
Liu 2022¶
Liu, C., Bruner, J., & Ammigan, R. (2022). Success Training for Academic Resiliency: An Advising Intervention Program for Undergraduate Students on Probation. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 11(2). https://ojed.org/jise
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Descriptive analysis of return-to-good-standing rates disaggregated by program completion level (none, some, all, extra) across four cohorts of STAR Lite participants and a 41-student comparison group. The article reports "Participants that completed all the STAR Lite program or extra components of the program returned to good academic standing at a higher rate than the comparison group." No inferential test or effect size accompanies this contrast.
"Participants that completed all the STAR Lite program or extra components of the program returned to good academic standing at a higher rate than the comparison group while students that completed none or only some of the program returned to academic standing at a lower rate."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- STAR Lite program participation showed no statistically significant relationship with returning to good academic standing after one semester — reports the opposite
- Male STAR Lite participants showed lower return-to-good-standing rates than male comparison students — related
- First-generation STAR Lite participants returned to good academic standing at higher rates than first-generation comparison students — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- Retention programs interpreted as meeting all three SDT needs show higher persistence and standing — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.