Claims

Male STAR Lite participants showed lower return-to-good-standing rates than male comparison students

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Male students in the STAR Lite program appeared to have less success returning to academic standing compared to the comparison group, with a 14% difference between male participants and non-participants. → Liu 2022

Evidence

Liu 2022

Liu, C., Bruner, J., & Ammigan, R. (2022). Success Training for Academic Resiliency: An Advising Intervention Program for Undergraduate Students on Probation. Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies in Education, 11(2). https://ojed.org/jise

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Descriptive subgroup analysis from Table 2 comparing return rates by sex across STAR Lite participants and comparison students. The article reports "Male students in the STAR Lite program appeared to have less success returning to academic standing compared to the comparison group." No statistical test is reported for this contrast.

"Male students in the STAR Lite program appeared to have less success returning to academic standing compared to the comparison group with a 14% difference between male participants and non-participants."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-03
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.