Claims

AR effect sizes do not differ significantly across grade levels, although the descriptive undergraduate effect (0.839) exceeds high school (0.623) and primary (0.303)

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · quant-synthesis r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Differences in AR effect sizes across primary education, high school, and undergraduate levels were not statistically significant (QB = 3.876, p = 0.144). → Ozdemir M. 2018

Evidence

Ozdemir M. 2018

Ozdemir M., Sahin C., Arcagok S., & Demir M. K. (2018). The effect of augmented reality applications in learning process: A meta-analysis study. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 74, 165-186. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2018.74.9

q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2

Subgroup moderator analysis within the meta-analysis across grade levels under a random-effects model. Pooled ES values were 0.839 for undergraduate (3 studies), 0.623 for high school (5 studies), and 0.303 for primary education (8 studies); the test showed no significant difference among the groups.

"This indicates that the distribution is heterogeneous and there is not a significant difference among the groups in terms of the effect values (QB = 3.876, p= 0.144)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.