Successful and unsuccessful listening performance in this study is associated with learners' strategic behaviour rather than with heritage or non-heritage status¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q1
Currency · newest study 2015 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Evidence quality · No study behind this claim is a peer-reviewed article with a DOI: it rests on a source with no registered publication record (a web page, book or unpublished report). It is kept because a design page cites it; treat it as a lead to check, not an established finding.
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? The authors interpret their data as showing that successful versus unsuccessful performance tends to be predominantly associated with strategic behaviour while listening rather than with whether learners are HLLs or NHLLs. → Denise Santos & Gláucia Silva 2015
Evidence¶
Denise Santos & Gláucia Silva 2015¶
Denise Santos & Gláucia Silva. (2015). Exploring Portuguese Heritage and Non-Heritage Learners' Perceptions of and Performance in Listening. The Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics 18(1), 63-86. https://journals.sfu.ca/cjal/index.php/cjal
q1 · i? · associational · r1
Authors' interpretation in the Discussion, drawing on their combined quantitative and qualitative findings and on prior characterisations of successful and unsuccessful listeners (O'Malley et al., 1989; Macaro et al., 2007). This is an author interpretation, not a tested result.
"successful or unsuccessful performance in listening in our data tends to be predominantly associated with learners' strategic behaviour while listening rather than with whether those students are HLLs or NHLLs, although at times the former may display a more efficient behaviour."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Heritage learners scored only slightly higher than non-heritage learners on listening tasks, with no statistically significant group difference — related
- Heritage learners showed broader attention to the passage and selective second-listening attention, while non-heritage learners focused on local information — related
- Heritage learners of Portuguese perceive listening as the easiest of the four skills, while non-heritage learners find it as challenging as other skills — related
- Both learner groups were more successful on listening tasks requiring local understanding than on tasks requiring integration of information or inference — related
- All participants believed heritage learners perform better in classroom listening, but dialectal differences posed difficulties for HLLs that NHLLs did not notice — related
- Successful discoverers regulate learning more systematically, planning experiments and monitoring progress, while unsuccessful learners work unsystematically — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
strategy-use-not-group-status-explains-listening-success |
title |
Successful and unsuccessful listening performance in this study is associated with learners' strategic behaviour rather than with heritage or non-heritage status |
description |
Successful and unsuccessful listening performance in this study is associated with learners' strategic behaviour rather than with heritage or non-heritage status |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2015 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-09-27 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — denise-santos-gláucia-silva-2015 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.