Claims

Students overwhelmingly preferred video materials over text materials for learning technical ESP content

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Almost all comments from a 17-student feedback group that experienced both materials were in favour of the video, citing reasons including that it is less boring, contains more information, and allows for better retention. → Milosevic 2017

Evidence

Milosevic 2017

Milosevic, D. (2017). Using video materials in English for technical sciences: a case study. In C. Sarré & S. Whyte (Eds), New developments in ESP teaching and learning research (pp. 15-30). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2017.cssw2017.743

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Qualitative evaluation in which 17 Industrial Engineering students read two texts and watched the video, then stated which mode they preferred and why. "Almost all of their comments were in favour of the video".

"Almost all of their comments were in favour of the video , implying that: (1) it is not as boring as the text ; (2) it contains more information; (3) it explains the subject-matter in a better way; (4) it is more effective since it consist s of a picture, text , and sound; (5) it is easier to grasp ; and (6) it allows for better retention of language elements."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.