Claims

Both video and text/image groups reported satisfaction with the materials and activities in class

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Both groups of participants were satisfied with the given material and the activities they were doing in class. → Milosevic 2017

Evidence

Milosevic 2017

Milosevic, D. (2017). Using video materials in English for technical sciences: a case study. In C. Sarré & S. Whyte (Eds), New developments in ESP teaching and learning research (pp. 15-30). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2017.cssw2017.743

q2 · i? · causal · r1

Based on a 10-item Likert-scale questionnaire and open-ended comments completed by both groups after the test. Feedback averages were similar across groups (e.g., "I have understood the given material very well": 3.7 video, 3.6 text).

"which leads to the overall conclusion of this survey that both groups of participants were satisfied with the given material and the activities they were doing in class."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.