Both video and text/image groups reported satisfaction with the materials and activities in class¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Both groups of participants were satisfied with the given material and the activities they were doing in class. → Milosevic 2017
Evidence¶
Milosevic 2017¶
Milosevic, D. (2017). Using video materials in English for technical sciences: a case study. In C. Sarré & S. Whyte (Eds), New developments in ESP teaching and learning research (pp. 15-30). Research-publishing.net. https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2017.cssw2017.743
q2 · i? · causal · r1
Based on a 10-item Likert-scale questionnaire and open-ended comments completed by both groups after the test. Feedback averages were similar across groups (e.g., "I have understood the given material very well": 3.7 video, 3.6 text).
"which leads to the overall conclusion of this survey that both groups of participants were satisfied with the given material and the activities they were doing in class."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Experimental-group students reported satisfaction with corpus-based lexical teaching while finding some materials too challenging — related
- Over 90% of students reported satisfaction with online learning resources and completion of online assignments in the blended PET course — related
- Students overwhelmingly preferred video materials over text materials for learning technical ESP content — related
- Students were highly satisfied with the paired course model and its components, with 100% willing to advise a new student to take the paired courses — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.