Claims

Students tend to overestimate their clinical judgment ability relative to evaluator-assessed scores

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2025 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? A comparative study found students tended to overestimate their clinical judgment abilities compared with evaluator-assessed scores using the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric. → Daneshfar Majid; Moonaghi Hossein Karimi 2025

Evidence

Daneshfar Majid; Moonaghi Hossein Karimi 2025

Daneshfar Majid; Moonaghi Hossein Karimi. (2025). The impact of clinical simulation on bridging the theory–practice gap in nursing education: a systematic review. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-025-07790-8

q2 · i? · review · r2

Comparative study (Høegh-Larsen et al., BMC Nursing, cited in review) comparing student self-assessment with evaluator assessment; "students tended to overestimate their clinical judgment abilities".

"students tended to overestimate their clinical judgment abilities when compared with evaluator-assessed scores using the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric, highlighting the importance of structured feedback in aligning self-perception with actual competence"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.