Students tend to overestimate their own performance when self-assessing with rubrics¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr3·q3
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? A recurring limitation across included studies was student overestimation of their own performance during rubric-based self-assessment, producing mismatches with faculty ratings. → Gadbail Amol Ramchandra 2026
Evidence¶
Gadbail Amol Ramchandra 2026¶
Gadbail Amol Ramchandra, Gondivkar Shailesh M., Yuwanati Monal B., Sonone Archana, Dhamande Mithilesh, Panchbhai Aarati, Hande Alka H., Patil Swati, Sarode Sachin C. (2026). Rubric use in dental education: a systematic review of design, implementation, and educational impact. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-09218-3
q3 · i? · review · r3
Narrative synthesis of limitations across the included studies. The review identifies "the overestimation by students of their own performance when self-assessing with rubrics" as a common learner-perspective theme, citing multiple included studies.
"a common theme was the overestimation by students of their own performance when self-assessing with rubrics, causing mismatches with faculty ratings"
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Law students overestimated their writing performance when self-assessing against the formal rubric — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
- A theoretical article, citing two simulation studies, reports that novice clinical learners overestimated their performance and that their confidence exceeded their accuracy — related
- In one 2×2 experiment with 120 undergraduates, an Assessment-Performance Calibration Activity (APCA) gave the most accurate self-assessment and least overconfidence, and adding a feedback-literacy script did not improve calibration further — related
- Learners are substantially overconfident when evaluating the quality of their self-generated examples — related
- Students perceived greater writing improvements than evaluators confirmed — related
- Students tend to overestimate their clinical judgment ability relative to evaluator-assessed scores — a narrower finding that bears on this claim
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-31 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.