Students reported their thinking had improved after induction to the critical thinking module¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? In interviews, the student nurses perceived that their thinking had improved following the critical thinking module. → Abdullah et al. 2010

Evidence¶

Abdullah et al. 2010¶

Abdul Ghani Kanesan Abdullah, Naser Jamil Alzaidiyeen, Ng Mooi Yee. (2010). The Practices of Critical Thinking Component and Its Impact in Malaysian Nurses Health Education. International Education Studies, 3(1). https://journals.ccsenet.org/index.php/ies

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Self-report from the qualitative interview sessions with 5 student nurses conducted after the treatment and after clinical training; the article states "their thinking had improved after their induction to the critical thinking module". No effect size is reported.

"The students also felt that their thinking had improved after their induction to the critical thinking module."

Discussion¶

Learner Variables¶

• Critical Thinking — outcome: instruction changes it

Related Claims¶

• Student nurses applied the seven CoRT critical thinking tools when delivering health talks to patients — related
• A critical thinking module produced significantly higher post-test achievement in health education than control among Malaysian nursing students — related
• Nursing students perceived that SBL using technology can enhance critical thinking development through opportunities for meta-cognition and reflection — related
• Non-traditional teaching methods significantly improve critical thinking skills in nursing students compared to control groups — a broader claim this one bears on