Claims

Student nurses applied the seven CoRT critical thinking tools when delivering health talks to patients

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2010 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Qualitative interview and health-talk data showed students applying the seven CoRT thinking skills, producing health talks tailored to individual patient needs. → Abdullah et al. 2010

Evidence

Abdullah et al. 2010

Abdul Ghani Kanesan Abdullah, Naser Jamil Alzaidiyeen, Ng Mooi Yee. (2010). The Practices of Critical Thinking Component and Its Impact in Malaysian Nurses Health Education. International Education Studies, 3(1). https://journals.ccsenet.org/index.php/ies

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Qualitative component: two semi-structured interview sessions with 5 randomly selected student nurses, plus patient interviews after clinical training. The article reports students "applied the seven critical thinking skills of the CoRT method where appropriate" in their health talks.

"The students had considered and had applied the seven critical thinking skills of the CoRT method where appropriate resulting in the st udents delivering a more comprehensive health talk tailor-made to the individual patient need."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-01
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.