Claims

Participants reported preferring learning from videos over learning from digital texts

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3 · i2 medium
Currency · newest study 2022 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i2 Participants' self-reported preference for learning from videos (M = 6.79) exceeded their preference for learning from digital texts (M = 4.31), with Cohen's d = 0.75. → Lucia Mason 2022

Evidence

Lucia Mason 2022

Lucia Mason, Christian Tarchi, Angelica Ronconi, Lucia Manzione, Natalia Latini, Ivar Bråten. (2022). Do medium and Context Matter when learning from multiple complementary Digital texts and videos? Instructional Science (2022) 50:653–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-022-09591-8

q3 · i2 · causal · r2

Self-report preference comparison among the 255 participants reported in the Participants section. Despite this stated preference, the experiment found no comprehension or integration advantage for videos over texts.

"Participants reportedly preferred learning from videos (M = 6.79, SD = 2.16) more than learning from digital texts ( M = 4.31, SD = 2.08), t(154) = 12.01, p < .001, Cohen’s d = 0.75)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id students-prefer-learning-from-videos
title Participants reported preferring learning from videos over learning from digital texts
description Participants reported preferring learning from videos over learning from digital texts
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2022
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — lucia-mason-2022

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.