Mean rank ordering of the four video types was stable across both course offerings, with hypothetical human-recorded personalized videos ranked highest and AI-generated non-personalized lowest¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Spring cohort mean ranks were 1.44 (human-recorded personalized), 2.31 (AI-generated personalized), 2.69 (human-recorded non-personalized), 3.56 (AI-generated non-personalized); Fall showed a nearly identical pattern (1.57, 2.21, 2.69, 3.52). → Tomlinson 2026
Evidence¶
Tomlinson 2026¶
Tomlinson, B., Black, R.W., Patterson, D.J., van der Hoek, A., Ferguson, J. & Bietz, M.J. (2026). Students prefer personalized, AI-generated educational videos over non-personalized, human-recorded videos. Scientific Reports 16:21804. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-52798-9
q2 · i? · associational · r1
Mean rank aggregation of complete four-item rankings from the end-of-term survey, reported separately by cohort and combined. The human-recorded personalized condition was hypothetical (never produced); the article notes this ordering "was stable across course offerings".
"In the Spring cohort, human-recorded personalized videos had a mean rank of 1.44, followed by AI-generated personalized videos (2.31), human-recorded non-personalized videos (2.69), and AI-generated non-personalized videos (3.56). The Fall cohort showed a nearly identical pattern (1.57, 2.21, 2.69, and 3.52, respectively)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Guo et al. found engagement depends on video production style: short videos, talking heads on slides, Khan-style drawing more engaging than slides or coding, classroom recording weak online — the general claim this finding bears on, with the studies behind it
- Students preferred AI-generated personalized videos over human-recorded non-personalized videos in direct comparison — related
- Nearly nine in ten students ranked a personalized video as their top choice — related
- Students preferred human-recorded over AI-generated videos when personalization was held constant, but this effect was smaller than the personalization effect — related
- Students oppose preferring AI videos over instructor-recorded videos and distrust AI video information as much as human-presented information — reports the opposite
- Participants reported preferring learning from videos over learning from digital texts — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
stable-mean-rank-ordering-four-video-types |
title |
Mean rank ordering of the four video types was stable across both course offerings, with hypothetical human-recorded personalized videos ranked highest and AI-generated non-personalized lowest |
description |
Mean rank ordering of the four video types was stable across both course offerings, with hypothetical human-recorded personalized videos ranked highest and AI-generated non-personalized lowest |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2026 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-11 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — tomlinson-2026 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.