In Study 1, only the Very High All profile showed greater mathematics growth than the Average All profile, and profiles did not differ in reading growth.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? The Very High All profile was associated with greater mathematics growth achievement than the Average All profile, while other profiles did not differ in mathematics growth and no profile differences emerged for reading growth. → Linnenbrink-Garcia 2018
Evidence¶
Linnenbrink-Garcia 2018¶
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Wormington, S. V., Snyder, K. E., Riggsbee, J., Perez, T., Ben-Eliyahu, A., & Hill, N. E. (2018). Multiple Pathways to Success: An Examination of Integrative Motivational Profiles Among Upper Elementary and College Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(7), 1026-1048. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000245
q3 · i? · associational · r1
Analysis of state standardized-test growth scores for fifth graders (N = 158) via BCH equality tests. Only "the Very High All profile was associated with greater mathematics growth achievement than the Average All profile"; reading growth showed no significant profile differences.
"Again, the Very High All profile was associated with greater mathematics growth achievement than the Average All profile; the Moderate-High All and Intrinsic and Confident profiles did not differ in mathematics achievement growth from the other profiles. There were no significant differences in reading growth achievement based on the profiles."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Four integrative motivational profiles (Moderate-High All, Intrinsic and Confident, Average All, Very High All) were identified among upper elementary students. — related
- In Study 1, the Moderate-High All, Intrinsic and Confident, and Very High All profiles showed higher behavioral and cognitive engagement than the Average All profile. — related
- Gender differences in mathematics and science achievement are negligible among top-performing math students, while female students show better reading achievement — related
- Among top-performing math students, male students show strongly math-oriented math–reading achievement profiles whereas female students' profiles are more balanced — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.