Four integrative motivational profiles (Moderate-High All, Intrinsic and Confident, Average All, Very High All) were identified among upper elementary students.¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2023: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Latent profile analysis of five motivational constructs yielded a best-fitting four-profile solution in a fifth-grade sample. → Linnenbrink-Garcia 2018
Evidence¶
Linnenbrink-Garcia 2018¶
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Wormington, S. V., Snyder, K. E., Riggsbee, J., Perez, T., Ben-Eliyahu, A., & Hill, N. E. (2018). Multiple Pathways to Success: An Examination of Integrative Motivational Profiles Among Upper Elementary and College Students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(7), 1026-1048. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000245
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Latent profile analysis of mastery, performance-approach, performance-avoidance goals, perceived competence, and task value among 158 fifth graders. A "four-profile solution best fit the data"; the four profiles were labeled Moderate-High All, Intrinsic and Confident, Average All, and Very High All.
"Fit indices indicated that a four-profile solution best fit the data (see Table 2). Based on the changes in the AIC, BIC, and adjusted BIC, both a four and five profile solution were reasonable to consider."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Similar integrative motivational profiles were identified among college science students as among upper elementary students, with sample-specific differences. — related
- In Study 1, the Moderate-High All, Intrinsic and Confident, and Very High All profiles showed higher behavioral and cognitive engagement than the Average All profile. — related
- In Study 1, only the Very High All profile showed greater mathematics growth than the Average All profile, and profiles did not differ in reading growth. — related
- Five cross-domain motivational profiles emerge among ninth-graders in both semesters: Adjusted, Highly motivated, Unattached, Math-motivated, and Language-motivated — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-25 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.