The teacher and researcher judged the individualized tablet-group students more motivated than the control group, but report this as a subjective opinion¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q1
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q1 i? Both observers agreed the experimental group was more motivated, while explicitly flagging this as subjective. → Klubal et al. 2017

Evidence¶

Klubal et al. 2017¶

Libor Klubal, Katerina Kostolanyova and Vojtěch Gybas. (2017). Using Tablet and iTunesU as Individualized Instruction Tools. 13th International Conference Mobile Learning 2017. ISBN: 978-989-8533-61-6. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED579278

q1 · i? · causal · r1

Authors' interpretation from the results discussion, not a measured outcome: the observers "agreed that the students in the experimental group were more motivated", with no motivation instrument reported.

"Both the researcher and the teacher agreed that the students in the experimental group were more motivated than those in the control group. But this is only a subjective opinion of a teacher and researcher."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• The multimedia tool was reported to motivate students and support positive attitudes toward the course — related
• Students report that daily-life WebQuest tasks made learning fun and that group work strengthened solutions and motivation — related
• Students in the individualized tablet lesson progressed far enough to reach a competitive game activity that the frontal-instruction control group could not reach due to time constraints — related
• In a 45-minute equations lesson, students in the tablet-and-iTunesU individualized group solved more problems than students in the frontal-instruction control group — related