Claims

Suspensions are more salient for students who personally experience suspension than for their peers

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? The effects of suspension are more salient for offending students who personally experience suspension than for their peers. → Lacoe 2019

Evidence

Lacoe 2019

Lacoe, J., & Steinberg, M. P. (2019). Do Suspensions Affect Student Outcomes? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol. 41, issue 1. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/do-suspensions-affect-student-outcomes doi:10.3102/0162373718794897

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Comparing effects on offending students versus peers in the Philadelphia panel analysis, the article concludes "Suspensions are more salient for students who personally experience suspension than for their peers." No effect size is printed.

"Suspensions are more salient for students who personally experience suspension than for their peers."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id suspensions-more-salient-for-suspended-students-than-peers
title Suspensions are more salient for students who personally experience suspension than for their peers
description Suspensions are more salient for students who personally experience suspension than for their peers
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — lacoe-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.