Claims

Peer exposure to suspensions does not change peer absences

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Exposure to suspensions for more serious misconduct does not change peer absences. → Lacoe 2019

Evidence

Lacoe 2019

Lacoe, J., & Steinberg, M. P. (2019). Do Suspensions Affect Student Outcomes? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, vol. 41, issue 1. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/do-suspensions-affect-student-outcomes doi:10.3102/0162373718794897

q3 · i? · causal · r2

In the same Philadelphia panel analysis of peer spillovers, the article reports that exposure to suspensions for serious misconduct "does not change peer absences." No test statistic or effect size is printed in the available text.

"Exposure to suspensions for more serious misconduct has very small, negative spillovers onto peer achievement, but does not change peer absences."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id suspension-spillovers-no-change-peer-absences
title Peer exposure to suspensions does not change peer absences
description Peer exposure to suspensions does not change peer absences
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2019
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — lacoe-2019

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.