Claims

Differences between the paired experimental groups and between the paired control groups are not statistically significant on achievement or retention tests

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r1 · q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q3 i? Within-condition comparisons of the two experimental groups and the two control groups on achievement and retention tests were not statistically significant (p>.05). → Bahadır ERİŞTİ – Mustafa POLAT 2017

Evidence

Bahadır ERİŞTİ – Mustafa POLAT 2017

Bahadır ERİŞTİ – Mustafa POLAT. (2017). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SYNECTICS INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL ON FOREIGN LANGUAGE VOCABULARY TEACHING. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, Volume 5, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.1753

q3 · i? · causal · r1

Independent t-tests comparing the two experimental groups and the two control groups with each other on achievement and retention test parts. All reported comparisons were not statistically significant (p>.05), which the article takes to show results did not stem from group structure or student variables.

"the difference between the means of the first experimental group for the second and the third parts of the achievement tests ( =86.17 & =87.36) and the second experimental group ( =86.51 & =89.48) is n ot statistically significant (p>.05)."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.