Differences between the paired experimental groups and between the paired control groups are not statistically significant on achievement or retention tests¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q3
Currency · newest study 2017 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Within-condition comparisons of the two experimental groups and the two control groups on achievement and retention tests were not statistically significant (p>.05). → Bahadır ERİŞTİ – Mustafa POLAT 2017
Evidence¶
Bahadır ERİŞTİ – Mustafa POLAT 2017¶
Bahadır ERİŞTİ – Mustafa POLAT. (2017). THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SYNECTICS INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL ON FOREIGN LANGUAGE VOCABULARY TEACHING. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, Volume 5, Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.18298/ijlet.1753
q3 · i? · causal · r1
Independent t-tests comparing the two experimental groups and the two control groups with each other on achievement and retention test parts. All reported comparisons were not statistically significant (p>.05), which the article takes to show results did not stem from group structure or student variables.
"the difference between the means of the first experimental group for the second and the third parts of the achievement tests ( =86.17 & =87.36) and the second experimental group ( =86.51 & =89.48) is n ot statistically significant (p>.05)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Unpretested groups showed no significant difference between their own post-test and retention test scores — related
- Within-group score changes across pre-test, post-test and retention test were significant in both pretested groups, with larger variance explained in the experimental group — related
- The ADI group showed significant within-group gains on demonstrated scientific literacy from pre- to post-test, while the structured-inquiry group did not — related
- Paired-samples t-tests show a significant mean-score gain from pre- to post-test in the VHPI group but not in the conventional-instruction group — related
- Both ITS and traditionally instructed groups improved significantly from pre-test to post-test — related
- Synectics-based teaching produces significantly higher retention of indirectly learned vocabulary than the direct method — related
- Synectics-based vocabulary teaching produces significantly higher retention of targeted vocabulary than the direct method five weeks after instruction — related
- Synectics-based teaching leads students to learn far more words indirectly during the process, with significantly higher learning levels of those words — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-11-02 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.