Older adults rate the blended LMS workshop positively on ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude toward using, and intention to use¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causalr1·q2
Currency · newest study 2018 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? In the TAM-based validation, most BLG participants agreed the system was easy to use, useful, attractive to use, and that they intended to keep using it. → Martínez-Alcalá CI 2018
Evidence¶
Martínez-Alcalá CI 2018¶
Martínez-Alcalá CI, Rosales-Lagarde A, Alonso-Lavernia MÁ, Ramírez-Salvador JÁ, Jiménez-Rodríguez B, Cepeda-Rebollar RM, López-Noguerola JS, Bautista-Díaz ML and Agis-Juárez RA (2018) Digital Inclusion in Older Adults: A Comparison Between Face-to-Face and Blended Digital Literacy Workshops. Front. ICT 5:21. https://doi.org/10.3389/fict.2018.00021
q2 · i? · causal · r1
TAM-based validation test (five-point Likert scale) applied to the blended workshop group after the workshops ended, covering ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude toward using, and intention to use; counts printed per response category (e.g., 15 positive on intention to use), no effect sizes.
"Finally, in the intention to use variable, 15 older adults indicated a positive agreement stat ing that they will use the system to reinforce their knowledge dur ing and after the workshop (see Figure 6)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- The blended workshop group increased digital competence more than the face-to-face group after the workshops — related
- Years of education correlate positively with pre-workshop digital literacy scores in older adults — related
- Digital literacy workshops ameliorate older adults' digital competence in both face-to-face and blended modalities — related
- Participants held generally positive attitudes toward VISIGARP but rated diagram layout clarity low while finding layout easy to adjust — related
- Adult ESL learners report above-neutral perceptions of ASR as a writing tool on usefulness, ease of use, and intention to use — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
tam-validation-blended-workshop-older-adults |
title |
Older adults rate the blended LMS workshop positively on ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude toward using, and intention to use |
description |
Older adults rate the blended LMS workshop positively on ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude toward using, and intention to use |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2018 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — martínez-alcalá-ci-2018 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.