Research on K-12 intertextual integration is dominated by secondary-level samples, essay tasks, and informational socioscientific document sets¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · quant-synthesisr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? Of 25 studies, 80% involved secondary-level students, 64% used essay tasks, and all used informational rather than narrative documents, with 92% addressing socioscientific topics. → Daniel R. Espinas 2024
Evidence¶
Daniel R. Espinas 2024¶
Daniel R. Espinas, Brennan W. Chandler. (2024). Correlates of K-12 Students' Intertextual Integration. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09889-8
q3 · i? · review · r3
Review synthesis of task features across the 25 included studies. Essay writing was the most common task; the review also reports "In all the studies, the documents were informational rather than narrative" and 92% involved socioscientific topics.
"The most common task (k = 16, 64%) involved having participants read the documents for the purpose of writing an essay. These included writing arguments (k = 9, 36%), opinions (k = 1, 4%), or combinations of arguments and summaries/syntheses (k = 5, 20%)."
Daniel R. Espinas 2024 (2)¶
Daniel R. Espinas, Brennan W. Chandler. (2024). Correlates of K-12 Students' Intertextual Integration. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-024-09889-8
q3 · i? · quant-synthesis · r2
Review synthesis of participant characteristics across 5600 participants (median = 99, range = 44–1434) in studies from five countries, with Norway (k = 9) and Italy (k = 6) most common. Elementary-level students were studied far less than secondary-level students.
"Grade levels ranged from fourth to twelfth, with five studies (20%) involving students at the elementary level (grades K-5) and (80%) at the secondary level (grades 6–12)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Single-document comprehension is the most studied literacy correlate of K-12 intertextual integration, with correlations ranging from near zero to moderate-strong — related
- Word-level reading fluency is positively associated with intertextual integration among K-12 students, including readers with developmental dyslexia — related
- Verbal working memory shows mixed associations with intertextual integration, from near zero to moderate-strong depending on study — related
- Metacognition and comprehension strategy use are weakly to moderately associated with intertextual integration among K-12 students — related
- Across 25 studies of K-12 readers, individual differences in literacy, cognition, metacognition, knowledge, beliefs, and motivation are positively and moderately associated with intertextual integration — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
task-document-features-k12-intertextual-integration-research |
title |
Research on K-12 intertextual integration is dominated by secondary-level samples, essay tasks, and informational socioscientific document sets |
description |
Research on K-12 intertextual integration is dominated by secondary-level samples, essay tasks, and informational socioscientific document sets |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-21 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
2 — daniel-r-espinas-2024, daniel-r-espinas-2024-2 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.