Team-based learning showed significantly higher performance than traditional learning in one included study¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · review r3 · q2
Currency · newest study 2026 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q2 i? In the Hossain et al. study reviewed, TBL showed significantly higher performance (58.33%) compared to traditional learning (44.4%, p = 0.01). → de Oliveira Carlota Rocha 2026

Evidence¶

de Oliveira Carlota Rocha 2026¶

de Oliveira Carlota Rocha, da Silva Barboza Andressa, de Andrade Juliana Silva Ribeiro, Lund Rafael Guerra. (2026). Scoping Review on Active Teaching and Learning Methodologies in Dentistry. European Journal of Dental Education. https://doi.org/10.1111/eje.13109

q2 · i? · review · r3

The review reports, citing Hossain et al. (2022), that "TBL showed significantly higher performance (58.33%) compared to traditional learning (44.4%, p = 0.01)" in periodontology. The review narrates this single study; its design was not independently verified.

"TBL showed significantly higher performance (58.33%) compared to traditional learning (44.4%, p = 0.01)"

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Two controlled studies found significantly higher examination scores and satisfaction in TBL groups compared with traditional lecture-based instruction — related
• Included studies report positive correlations between TBL participation and assessment performance, with i-RAT scores predicting final examination performance — related
• Student preference for CBL, PBL or TBL over traditional teaching was reported in 15 of 22 studies (68.1%), but only two studies used a controlled comparison with lecture — related
• Students in TBL groups report higher satisfaction than students in LBL groups — related