Teachers rated students' capacity for self-determination differently by level of cognitive impairment, but rated opportunities for self-determination similarly across impairment levels¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Teachers viewed students' capacity for self-determination differently based on level of cognitive impairment, but did not view students' opportunities for self-determination differently. → Shogren 2007
Evidence¶
Shogren 2007¶
Shogren, K.A., Wehmeyer, M.L, et al. (2007) Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 488-509. https://hdl.handle.net/1808/10983
q2 · i? · associational · r?
Structural equation modeling of baseline data from a multistate longitudinal project found this teacher-rating pattern. The article reports that "teachers viewed students' capacity for self-determination differently based on level of cognitive impairment, but not students' opportunities for self-determination." No effect sizes are printed in the available text.
"The findings suggest that teachers viewed students' capacity for self-determination differently based on level of cognitive impairment, but not students' opportunities for self-determination."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Capacity, opportunity, and transition empowerment predicted students' self-reported self-determination, but degree of inclusion in general education did not — related
- The study targeted students with learning disabilities, mild and moderate mental retardation, and other health impairments — related
- Baseline data from a multistate longitudinal self-determination intervention project were analyzed with structural equation modeling — a broader claim this one bears on
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
teacher-capacity-ratings-vary-cognitive-impairment-opportunities-do-not |
title |
Teachers rated students' capacity for self-determination differently by level of cognitive impairment, but rated opportunities for self-determination similarly across impairment levels |
description |
Teachers rated students' capacity for self-determination differently by level of cognitive impairment, but rated opportunities for self-determination similarly across impairment levels |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2007 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — shogren-2007 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.