The study targeted students with learning disabilities, mild and moderate mental retardation, and other health impairments¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr?·q2
Currency · newest study 2007 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person · overdue for a recheck since 2012: baselines and conditions change
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? The article examines individual and ecological predictors of self-determination for students with learning disabilities, mild and moderate mental retardation, and other health impairments. → Shogren 2007
Evidence¶
Shogren 2007¶
Shogren, K.A., Wehmeyer, M.L, et al. (2007) Examining individual and ecological predictors of the self-determination of students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 73(4), 488-509. https://hdl.handle.net/1808/10983
q2 · i? · associational · r?
The abstract states the study's population and scope: it "examines the impact of multiple individual and ecological factors on the self-determination of students with learning disabilities, mild and moderate mental retardation, and other health impairments." Findings are scoped to these disability categories.
"This article examines the impact of multiple individual and ecological factors on the self-determination of students with learning disabilities, mild and moderate mental retardation, and other health impairments."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Teachers rated students' capacity for self-determination differently by level of cognitive impairment, but rated opportunities for self-determination similarly across impairment levels — related
- Capacity, opportunity, and transition empowerment predicted students' self-reported self-determination, but degree of inclusion in general education did not — related
- The pattern of predictive relationships for self-determination differed significantly depending on which measure of self-determination was used — related
- Baseline data from a multistate longitudinal self-determination intervention project were analyzed with structural equation modeling — related
- The high self-determination group was more likely to maintain a checking and a savings account, with no significant differences in postsecondary education enrollment — related
- High self-determination former students were more likely to express a preference to live outside the family home, though actual living arrangements did not differ by self-determination group — related
- IQ, psychological empowerment, self-realization, and self-regulation subscale scores contributed significantly to variance in hourly pay, while number of vocational education classes did not — related
- High wage earners had higher total self-determination, autonomy, and psychological empowerment scores than low wage earners, controlling for intelligence — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
self-determination-study-population-disability-categories |
title |
The study targeted students with learning disabilities, mild and moderate mental retardation, and other health impairments |
description |
The study targeted students with learning disabilities, mild and moderate mental retardation, and other health impairments |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2007 |
recheck_by |
2012 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-17 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — shogren-2007 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.