Claims

Teachers perceive 360° VR videos as engaging, feasible, and useful for explaining concepts difficult to demonstrate traditionally

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2020 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Design limits · Araiza-Alba 2020: no comparison group (read from the study by two models, 2026-10-30)

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? All four interviewed teachers supported higher engagement with 360° VR videos and reported confidence to run similar workshops without a lifeguard present. → Araiza-Alba 2020

Evidence

Araiza-Alba 2020

Araiza-Alba, P., Keane, T., Matthews, B., Simpson, K., Strugnell, G., Chen, W. S., & Kaufman, J. (2020). The potential of 360-degree Virtual Reality videos to teach water-safety skills to children. https://www.lsv.com.au/vr

q2 · i? · causal · r2

Semi-structured focus groups with four teachers after the workshops found unanimous support for the quantitative engagement findings, with teachers noting 360° VR videos clarified rip-current concepts and broke down barriers of cost and travel.

"The qualitative analysis of the focus groups showed that all the teachers (n = 4) supported the above results regarding a higher level of engagement with 360° VR videos"

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-30
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.