Claims

In a pedagogical space, epistemic injustice might be activated when teachers' identity prejudice leads them to give a student less credit, and the curriculum can block or enable students' understanding and expression of their social experiences

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · theoretical r2–r3 · q1
Currency · newest study 2021 · checked against its sources 2026-10-20 (automated, 2 of 2 entries) · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Drawing on Kotzee (2017), the article argues that epistemic injustice might be activated by giving a student less credit because of teachers' identity prejudice, so that the student's testimony is taken less seriously. → Göktürk 2021 q1 i? The article reports Kotzee's (2017) argument that the curriculum can block or enable students' understanding of particular social experiences and their ability to express their understanding of the world. → Göktürk 2021 (2)

Evidence

Göktürk 2021

Göktürk, D. (2021). Epistemic Injustice and Cultural Processes in Education. Kastamonu Education Journal, 29(1), 218-227. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.732138

q1 · i? · theoretical · r3

Theoretical argument the article attributes to Kotzee (2017): epistemic injustice "might be activated through giving less credit to a student due to the identity prejudice teachers have". The article offers this as a conceptual account, not a tested finding.

"In a pedagogical space, epistemic injustice might be activated through giving less credit to a student due to the identity prejudice teachers have which resulted in taking student’s testimony less seriously."

Göktürk 2021 (2)

Göktürk, D. (2021). Epistemic Injustice and Cultural Processes in Education. Kastamonu Education Journal, 29(1), 218-227. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.732138

q1 · i? · theoretical · r2

Theoretical argument the article attributes to Kotzee (2017): the curriculum "has the potential of blocking and enabling" students' understanding of social experiences. The article concludes the curriculum functions as a means of epistemic injustice; no empirical evidence is reported.

"Putting all this together, Kotzee (2017) argues that the curriculum has the potential of blocking and enabling “students’ understanding of particular social experiences and encourage or inhibit the ability of students from particular cultures to express their particular understanding of the world.” (p.327)."

Discussion

Learner Variables

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id teacher-identity-prejudice-and-curriculum-can-enact-epistemic-injustice-toward-students
title In a pedagogical space, epistemic injustice might be activated when teachers' identity prejudice leads them to give a student less credit, and the curriculum can block or enable students' understanding and expression of their social experiences
description In a pedagogical space, epistemic injustice might be activated when teachers' identity prejudice leads them to give a student less credit, and the curriculum can block or enable students' understanding and expression...
status review
evidence_strength weak
newest_evidence 2021
source_checked 2026-10-20
generated by claude/unspecified on 2026-09-24
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — göktürk-2021, göktürk-2021-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.