Claims

The three-dimensional teacher-reported model does not hold in all countries, so configural invariance was not achieved and cross-country comparison of teacher-perceived instructional quality was hardly possible

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study (2 entries) · associational r2 · q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Teacher support could not be identified in Latvia and Romania, and cognitive activation differed in those countries. → Xin Liu 2023 q2 i? Configural invariance was not achieved for teacher data because factor structures differed across countries. → Xin Liu 2023 (2)

Evidence

Xin Liu 2023

Xin Liu, Kajsa Yang Hansen, Jan De Neve, Martin Valcke. (2023). Teacher versus student perspectives on instructional quality in mathematics education across countries. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09652-6

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Country-by-country CFA of TALIS 2013 teacher data in the rTPL database. When modeling countries separately, the article reports "Teacher support could not be identified in Latvia and Romania" and a three-item teacher support factor in Finland.

"Teacher support could not be identified in Latvia and Romania, and only three items helped in constituting this dimension in Finland"

Xin Liu 2023 (2)

Xin Liu, Kajsa Yang Hansen, Jan De Neve, Martin Valcke. (2023). Teacher versus student perspectives on instructional quality in mathematics education across countries. Instructional Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-023-09652-6

q2 · i? · associational · r2

Measurement invariance testing of the teacher measurement model across the seven countries in Mplus. Because country factor structures differed, the article concludes "the configural invariance level was not achieved" for teacher-perceived data.

"Since configural invariance requires the factor structure to be equal across groups, these analysis results imply that the configural invariance level was not achieved."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id teacher-model-configural-invariance-fails
title The three-dimensional teacher-reported model does not hold in all countries, so configural invariance was not achieved and cross-country comparison of teacher-perceived instructional quality was hardly possible
description The three-dimensional teacher-reported model does not hold in all countries, so configural invariance was not achieved and cross-country comparison of teacher-perceived instructional quality was hardly possible
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2023
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-18
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 2 — xin-liu-2023, xin-liu-2023-2

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.