Perceived teacher scaffolding is associated with more surface- and deep-level strategy use during the performance phase of SRL¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · reviewr2·q2
Currency · newest study 2023 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i? Students who perceived high levels of scaffolding from their teachers used more surface- and deep-level learning strategies during the performance phase. → Niels J. de Ruig 2023
Evidence¶
Niels J. de Ruig 2023¶
Niels J. de Ruig, Peter F. de Jong, Marjolein Zee. (2023). Stimulating Elementary School Students' Self-Regulated Learning Through High-Quality Interactions and Relationships: A Narrative Review. Educational Psychology Review. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09795-5
q2 · i? · review · r2
One of only two cross-sectional studies on classroom-level interactions and regulation of cognition, conducted in upper elementary schools in the Netherlands, using the CP-SRLI, the only included instrument distinguishing SRL components and phases. No effect size is printed for this finding.
"Results of this large-scale study showed that students who perceived high levels of scaffolding from their teachers used more surface- and deep-level strategies during the performance phase of SRL (Baas et al., 2015)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Student-reported SRL promotion is associated with students' self-efficacy, utility value and attainment value for SRL at class and student levels, but not with perceived cost — related
- Student-reported SRL promotion is not significantly associated with students' perceived cost of using strategies at class level, and only negligibly (r = −.04) at student level — related
- Pre-actional metacognitive, motivational, and positive-emotional components are positively associated with regulatory behavior in the actional phase, while anger and anxiety are negatively associated — related
- Classroom-level instructional support, organization, and emotional support are each positively associated with upper elementary students' metacognitive strategy use — related
- Research on teacher-student interactions and elementary SRL shows major gaps: no studies of emotion regulation, few on cognition regulation, and 70% reliance on student self-reports — related
- A constructivist course increased perceived deep-level assessment demands but students still reported more frequent use of surface approaches to learning — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
teacher-scaffolding-strategy-use-performance-phase |
title |
Perceived teacher scaffolding is associated with more surface- and deep-level strategy use during the performance phase of SRL |
description |
Perceived teacher scaffolding is associated with more surface- and deep-level strategy use during the performance phase of SRL |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
weak |
newest_evidence |
2023 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — niels-j-de-ruig-2023 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.