Student-reported SRL promotion is associated with students' self-efficacy, utility value and attainment value for SRL at class and student levels, but not with perceived cost¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr2·q3
Currency · newest study 2024 · checked against its sources 2026-10-19 (automated, 1 of 1 entry) · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q3 i? At the class level, student-reported SRL promotion was significantly related to self-efficacy (β = 0.44), utility value (β = 0.78) and attainment value (β = 0.58), with similar but weaker effects at the student level (β = [0.18, 0.32]). → Johannes Jud 2024
q3 i0 Student-reported SRL promotion was not significantly associated with students' perceived cost at either level. → Johannes Jud 2024
Evidence¶
Johannes Jud 2024¶
Johannes Jud, Yves Karlen, Carmen Nadja Hirt. (2024). Linking teachers' and students' motivation for self-regulated learning: is there a signal and how is it transmitted? Metacognition and Learning. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-024-09393-y
q3 · i? · associational · r2
Full-perspective multilevel SEM (167 teachers, 2,785 students); class-level results show "higher values for self-efficacy (β = 0.44), higher utility value (β = 0.78) and higher attainment value (β = 0.58)". Student-level effects were β = [0.18, 0.32]; class-level R² = [0.39, 0.79], student-level R² = [0.02, 0.13].
"Classes who reported higher promotion of SRL also showed higher values for self-efficacy (β = 0.44), higher utility value (β = 0.78) and higher attainment value (β = 0.58). However, student-reported SRL promotion was not significantly associated with students' costs."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Teachers' self-efficacy for SRL promotion shows significant indirect effects on students' self-efficacy, utility value and attainment value via teacher- and student-reported SRL promotion, with no indirect path to cost — related
- No significant direct effects exist between teachers' motivation to promote SRL and students' SRL motivation — related
- Student-reported SRL promotion is not significantly associated with students' perceived cost of using strategies at class level, and only negligibly (r = −.04) at student level — related
- Teachers' self-efficacy for SRL promotion, but not their attainment value, is positively related to their self-reported SRL promotion when both are modelled simultaneously — related
- Perceived teacher scaffolding is associated with more surface- and deep-level strategy use during the performance phase of SRL — related
- Including student-reported SRL promotion is critical for finding indirect teacher-to-student motivation links: teacher-report-only models show none, student-report-only models show significant indirect effects — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
student-reported-srl-promotion-linked-to-student-motivation |
title |
Student-reported SRL promotion is associated with students' self-efficacy, utility value and attainment value for SRL at class and student levels, but not with perceived cost |
description |
Student-reported SRL promotion is associated with students' self-efficacy, utility value and attainment value for SRL at class and student levels, but not with perceived cost |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
2024 |
source_checked |
2026-10-19 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-19 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — johannes-jud-2024 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.