Teachers' estimates show the highest single-measure correlation with the Stanford Revision (.72, 60 cases)¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associationalr1·q2·i3large
Currency · newest study 1921 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q2 i3 Among single measures, teachers' estimates of maturity and ability in reading correlated most highly with the Stanford Revision mental ages (r = .72, 60 cases). → Chassell 1921
Evidence¶
Chassell 1921¶
Chassell, C. F., & Chassell, L. M. (1921). A survey of the three first grades of the Horace Mann School by means of psychological tests and teachers' estimates, and a statistical evaluation of the methods employed. Part II. The Journal of Educational Psychology, 12(5), 243-252. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0068285
q2 · i3 · associational · r1
Correlational analysis of survey data from three first grades, comparing teachers' rankings in maturity and ability in reading with Stanford Revision mental ages. The article reports the printed correlation r = .72 (60 cases), which codes as a large effect (i = 3).
"An examination of the correlations reported for the Stanford Revision shows that the highest correlation between this measure and any other single measure appears in the case of teachers' estimates, nameh", .72 (60 cases being included)."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Group tests correlate much lower with the Stanford Revision (.45 and .53) and only .37 with each other — related
- Stanford-Binet mental age correlations with reading rise from grade III to grade VI — related
- Any single measure type approximates the composite (.89, .87, .85) but has only limited value used alone — related
- Group tests combined with teachers' estimates correlate .77 with the Stanford Revision, questioning the necessity of individual examination — related
- Combinations of two measure types correlate very highly with the composite (.96, .91, .98), with little difference between choices — related
- Against Stanford Binet criteria for 300 grade 3–6 children, the mental index correlated .47, the educational index .52, crude score with mental age .80, mental with educational index .62, and Difference with I.Q. .21 — related
- Mental index ratings on the group test showed close correspondence over a two-year interval (r = .72, rank correlation .77) among 46 retested children — related
- The Pressey Mental Survey Primer Scale for grades 1-3 requires neither reading nor writing and correlates .58 with teachers' estimates — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
type |
claim |
id |
teachers-estimates-highest-correlation-stanford-revision |
title |
Teachers' estimates show the highest single-measure correlation with the Stanford Revision (.72, 60 cases) |
description |
Teachers' estimates show the highest single-measure correlation with the Stanford Revision (.72, 60 cases) |
status |
review |
evidence_strength |
moderate |
newest_evidence |
1921 |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-24 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
sources |
1 — chassell-1921 |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.