Teachers are more supportive of teacher perception surveys for evaluating administrators than of student perception surveys for evaluating teachers¶

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · causal r2 · q3
Currency · newest study 2016 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims¶

q3 i? Support means were higher for teacher perception surveys (M = 3.61) than student perception surveys (M = 2.71). → Robinson 2016

Evidence¶

Robinson 2016¶

Robinson, C.; Finefter-Rosenblum, I.; Benshoof, C.; Gehlbach, H. (2016). Getting Teachers Excited about Student Feedback: It's all in the Ask. SREE Spring 2016 Conference. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED567735

q3 · i? · causal · r2

Descriptive comparison of the two 5-item scale means in the randomized survey study; the article reports means only ("𝑀 = 3.61 vs. 2.71") with no test statistic or effect size for this contrast.

"Unsurprisingly, teachers are more supportive of using teacher perception surveys to evaluate administrators than of using student perception surveys to evaluate teachers (𝑀 = 3.61 vs. 2.71, respectively)."

Discussion¶

Related Claims¶

• Asking teachers first about teacher perception surveys increases their support for student perception surveys (pre-registered split-ballot experiment) — related
• Teachers report the REACH observation process encouraged reflection and that they used observation feedback to improve their teaching — related
• Beginning teachers are more positive about REACH than teachers with more years of experience — related
• Most teachers and principals reported satisfaction with professional opportunities, school environment, and the TIF program — related
• Teacher and administrator perceptions of REACH changed little between Year 2 and Year 3 of implementation — related