Claims

Middle school math teachers are more likely to make productive than nonproductive adaptations to curricula

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · associational r? · q2
Currency · newest study 2024 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q2 i? Teachers were more likely to make productive over nonproductive adaptations to middle school math curricula. → Riley Stone 2024

Evidence

Riley Stone 2024

Riley Stone, Doug Van Dine, Jose Aguayo. (2024). Mathematical Learning Progressions: A Study of Teachers’ Content Adaptations and Alignment with Mathematical Learning Progressions. Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. https://www.mathematica.org/publications/mathematical-learning-progressions-a-study-of-teachers-content-adaptations-and-alignment

q2 · i? · associational · r?

A key finding of this mixed-methods study of teachers' content adaptations to middle school math curricula: "Teachers were more likely to make productive over nonproductive adaptations." No effect size is printed.

"Teachers were more likely to make productive over nonproductive adaptations."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
type claim
id teachers-more-productive-than-nonproductive-adaptations
title Middle school math teachers are more likely to make productive than nonproductive adaptations to curricula
description Middle school math teachers are more likely to make productive than nonproductive adaptations to curricula
status review
evidence_strength moderate
newest_evidence 2024
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-08
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content
sources 1 — riley-stone-2024

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.