Teachers perceived OUA as useful and easy to use, with positive cognitive evaluations suggesting low academic resistance¶
Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitativer?·q1
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person
Subclaims¶
Reading the evidence codes
q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r
the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.
This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.
q1 i? Interviewed teachers perceived OUA as very useful for systematising existing practices and as easy to use, consistent with TAM's perceived usefulness and ease-of-use conditions. → Herodotou 2019
Evidence¶
Herodotou 2019¶
Herodotou, C., Rienties, B., Boroowa, A., Zdrahal, Z., & Hlosta, M. (2019). A large-scale implementation of predictive learning analytics in higher education: the teachers' role and perspective. Education Tech Research Dev, 67, 1273–1306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09685-0
q1 · i? · qualitative · r?
Thematic analysis of six interviews found OUA systematised existing monitoring practices and made teachers more proactive. The article notes "OUA was perceived as easy to use and straightforward" and interprets this via TAM and low cognitive resistance under ARM.
"Participating teachers perceived OUA as a very useful tool for a range of reasons that often related to existing teaching practices and expertise."
Discussion¶
Related Claims¶
- Older adults rate the blended LMS workshop positively on ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude toward using, and intention to use — related
- Perceived ease-of-use based on simplicity and familiarity with common chart types heavily influenced teachers' visualization preferences — related
- Teachers' technology acceptance follows the TAM: perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and attitude toward technology predict technology integration, moderated by organizational, technological, and individual factors — related
Page metadata
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
status |
review |
generated |
by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28 |
trust |
unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content |
Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.