Claims

Teachers perceived OUA as useful and easy to use, with positive cognitive evaluations suggesting low academic resistance

Claim · All claims
Evidence · 1 study · qualitative r? · q1
Currency · newest study 2019 · not yet checked against its sources · not reviewed by a person

Subclaims

Reading the evidence codes

q is the design tier, i the impact, n the sample, and the kind with its r the rigour judged within that kind: what each code means.

This claim: no standardized effect is recorded in observations/ for it yet, so no benchmark reading is possible.

q1 i? Interviewed teachers perceived OUA as very useful for systematising existing practices and as easy to use, consistent with TAM's perceived usefulness and ease-of-use conditions. → Herodotou 2019

Evidence

Herodotou 2019

Herodotou, C., Rienties, B., Boroowa, A., Zdrahal, Z., & Hlosta, M. (2019). A large-scale implementation of predictive learning analytics in higher education: the teachers' role and perspective. Education Tech Research Dev, 67, 1273–1306. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09685-0

q1 · i? · qualitative · r?

Thematic analysis of six interviews found OUA systematised existing monitoring practices and made teachers more proactive. The article notes "OUA was perceived as easy to use and straightforward" and interprets this via TAM and low cognitive resistance under ARM.

"Participating teachers perceived OUA as a very useful tool for a range of reasons that often related to existing teaching practices and expertise."

Discussion

Page metadata
Field Value
status review
generated by process:wiki-ingest on 2026-10-28
trust unverified — no one has confirmed this page's content

Frontmatter is the page's machine-readable record — see the Schema & Guide.